Showing posts with label weight discrimination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label weight discrimination. Show all posts

Monday, November 14, 2011

Why Weight Bias is Bigotry

 Fat Is A Feminist (and Womanist)
Media Issue





NOTE: My work uses the term “fat” the way the Fat Liberation movement uses it.  “Fat” is used in a non-pejorative sense, to describe corpulent people rather than a negatively connoted  terms such as “obese” or worse yet, “morbidly obese,” or even “overweight.” It is an effort to reclaim and de-demonize “fat” as African-Americans have reclaimed what was a previously insulting use of the terms Black or African to describe us.  It is also an attempt to reform the language to separate the possibly positive descriptor “fat” from other negative descriptors often coupled with the term fat when it is spat, such as “and ugly,” “and sloppy,”  “and lazy” which readily apply to people of any size. When the biased terms of “obese and overweight” are used they are the terms of others, not this author.

Why Weight Bias is Bigotry
Weight bias is the notion that a person is fat because, she must be eating too much “bad” (but delicious!) food, as well as not exercising and thus by definition is undisciplined, lazy, (the cause and) worthy of all manner of viciousness.  It is also assumed that the fat person is a liar if she claims otherwise.  One of patriarchy’s worst nightmares is a woman not in patriarchal control…not behaving well according to patriarchal standards…Thus a fat woman is considered a villainous beast, not a woman at all.  Fat men are treated better but not much and it’s getting worse for both genders. In fact media mogul Oprah Winfrey’s favorite go-to-guy on health and weight loss – “Dr. Oz” (Much like the fearsome Wizard of Oz, Dr. Oz really is, in my professional opinion, a skinny fat-bigot, wizard breathing fire and smoke) while discussing hormonal causes for erectile dysfunction – says with a sneer on a program about sexuality,  that fat men were castrating themselves, “literally making women out of themselves” because the fat men don’t become thin.
Everyone’s body is NOT the same.  A weight loss diet that works wonders for one or some can cause others who faithfully follow it, to gain weight.  A grossly incomplete  list of the many interacting multiple reasons most fat people are fat includes[ii]: 1. genetic factors – by far the biggest group of complex causes including the way our bodies process carbohydrates, the number of fat cells we are born with, how and when our bodies physically signal hunger and satiation, metabolic factors, how sensitive one’s nervous system is, 2. repeated weight loss dieting, 3. fasting, 4. food pesticides, 5. other pollution and toxins, 6. depression, 7. sleep deprivation,  8. availability of “good” food (the jury is still out on what exactly that may be, 9. biologically driven food preferences, 10. non-biological family heritage regarding food and exercise, 11. lack of time for “sufficient” exercise, 12. lack of safe and pleasurable exercise options, 13. when one eats what, 14. poor available food quality, 15. other food industry practices, 16. increasingly required time sitting at a computer just to survive in most work and even home environments as employers, organizations and businesses force us into more online tasks to save their businesses money, 17. hydration, 18. alkalinity, 19. stress (including crime and all types of abuse) and the list goes on.
Weight Anti-Discrimination leaders urge us to emphasize health rather than weight loss.  To experience good health, virtually all of us should make lifelong efforts to exercise half an hour or more at least five times a week and enjoy organic foods that include large portions of fresh, high quality vegetables, fruits, the right amount of complete proteins and sleep in a dark, quiet well-ventilated room for 7 – 9 hours every night. 
That’s hard enough even for high income working people, nearly impossible for most of the rest.  What is tragic is that even doing all of that and more will never make most of those considered fat – thin enough to escape weight bias.  In fact media weight bias actually contributes to making people fatter and/or sicker in the effort to prove ourselves as worthy of being treated humanely and judged on the content of our character rather than the calibrations of a cruel scale.
Citing thousands of current studies, Australian researchers Michael Gard and Jan Wright say that the “obesity epidemic” and its resulting hysteria is the result of cultural ideology, rather than science or medicine.[iii]  In her book Rethinking Thin: The New Science of Weight  Loss – and the Myths and Realities of Dieting,  New York Times reporter Gina Kolata takes a historical survey of the diet industry and body ideals and dispels the assumption that the lack of will power is at the root of all fat people’s weight issues.[iv]
Next Post: 
The Media -- Project, Perpetuate and Create --Weight Bias
in Form and Content
This is the second in a series of posts from a paper I presented at the AEJMC Annual Conference 8/9/09. 


[i] Roberta R. Friedman, ScM, , “Weight Bias: The Need for Public Policy,” (Yale University Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity: New Haven Connecticut) 2008, 11 pages.
[ii] Various works including: Lisa Sanders, M.D., The Perfect Fit Diet: Combine What Science Knows About Weight Loss With What You Know About Yourself, (Rodale Inc.: United States) 2004, 358 pages.
[iii] Citation for Michael Gard and Jan Wright The Obesity Epidemic: Science, Morality and Ideology
[iv] Citation for Gina Kolata, Rethinking Thin: The New Science of Weight  Loss – and the Myths and Realities of Dieting,

Friday, November 11, 2011

Unfair and Damaging Weight Bias Exists in the Culture

Welcome to my home country - DAUFINation where all the definitions are daufinitions.
The next few posts will be excerpts from a presentation I made at a previous Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference in Denver.  The Minorities And Communication Division and Commission on the Status of Women co-sponsored the session.

NOTE: My work uses the term “fat” the way the Fat Liberation movement uses it.  “Fat” is used in a non-pejorative sense, to describe corpulent people rather than a negatively connoted  terms such as “obese” or worse yet, “morbidly obese,” or even “overweight.” It is an effort to reclaim and de-demonize “fat” as African-Americans have reclaimed what was a previously insulting use of the terms Black or African to describe us.  It is also an attempt to reform the language to separate the possibly positive descriptor “fat” from other negative descriptors often coupled with the term fat when it is spat, such as “and ugly,” “and sloppy,”  “and lazy” which readily apply to people of any size. When the biased terms of “obese and overweight” are used they are the terms of others, not this author.

Unfair and Damaging Weight Bias Exists in the Culture
A few years ago the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity at Yale University examined weight bias[i].  Rudd Center Director of Public Policy Roberta R. Friedman, ScM reports that “obese and overweight adults” experience weight discrimination from employers, doctors and teachers.   He says that weight discrimination causes serious medical, psychological, economic and social damage to the 66% of adults and 50% of children in the United States.  Rudd Center researchers and others say that weight bias, rather than fatness in and of itself, increases the risk that the victims will suffer depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, poor body image, suicidal acts and thoughts AND weight gain. The Center calls for public policy that includes weight in the list of categories that are covered in anti-discrimination laws on the local, state and federal level as is race and gender.
Next Post: Why Weight Bias is Bigotry


[i] Roberta R. Friedman, ScM, , “Weight Bias: The Need for Public Policy,” (Yale University Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity: New Haven Connecticut) 2008, 11 pages.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Mrs. Obama, We ALL need to exercise regardless of size.

Welcome to my home country DAUFINation where all the definitions are daufinitions.

                I am so relieved that First Lady Michelle Obama’s plan to work on childhood obesity is focusing NOT on weight loss dieting but instead on getting more and better grocery stores in low income neighborhoods.  She’s also promoting financial support for schools to get rid of their deep fryers, start organic school gardens, cook more nutritious food, as well as have it available in school vending machines.  Still, I wish the messages I see about her “war on childhood obesity” focused more on increasing activity for ALL CHILDREN rather than creating a “Biggest Loser – Kiddy Version” for only the queen and king sized kids.  In her nationally televised PSAs we should see smiling active big children with her, not just the slim ones.
            I beg the First Lady to be mindful that street crime and school yard teasing also make it difficult for inner city kids to be active.  I was a fat kid and not only did my dangerous Brooklyn neighborhood make every venture outside a risky proposition, but verbal and physical harassment, much like what we saw the large leading character in the award winning film Precious version of the novel  Push endure. 
We all should focus on more activity and better health rather than weight loss diets.  Weight loss diets actually make you fatter.  They also increase depression because repeated, desperate effort and failure as well as the notion that there’s nothing too horrible to subject yourself to if it makes you lose weight or at least claims it will is more than disheartening.  I ask the First Lady as well as anyone supporting ending childhood (or any) obesity, to also realize that following Mrs. Obama’s good initiatives will increase muscle (which weights more than fat) and MAYBE decrease weight a little but some of us, at any age, will never be as thin as she and her daughters are, or the media and medical doctors lead us to believe we should be.